(2024-04-29) When an interesting watch is boring... as it should be ------------------------------------------------------------------- It might look like I'm breaking my oath by writing about a Swiss made wristwatch in a place where non-Swiss wristwatches are usually talked about. Well, considering I'm about to exit the hobby soon, I think this might be an acceptable exception. So far, I've been using this watch for a week but this is exactly the case when you know almost everything about it from the week of usage, and the only things you can learn over time is how well it holds to its claims about accuracy and battery life. Of course, I'm talking about my current choice, the Certina C035.410.44.087.00 aka DS Caimano 39 Titanium. Well... What's so interesting about it then? First, it fulfills all of my requirements stated in my previous phlog post with its 39mm diameter, <8mm thickness, 20mm lug width, <44 mm lug to lug distance (although this isn't documented anywhere), all-titanium casing and bracelet, sapphire crystal with AR coating, 10 bar WR rating, minute hand reaching the minute markers and, finally, a thermocompensated quartz movement I'm gonna talk about a bit later. Second, this is the first watch in a long time where I don't want to replace the stock bracelet with something else, particularly because it's also thin, lightweight and made of titanium. It's a jubilee-type bracelet with solid links (including end links), dual finishing (the inner links are polished and the outer are matte titanium) and an internal two-sided butterfly-type clasp that totally disappears under the bracelet itself in the closed state, leaving only the pushers visible. And the total weight of the watch is quite featherlight for what it is: 67.4 grams after shortening the bracelet to my wrist size. Which, for the record, is only about 12 to 14 grams heavier than my all-resin 5600-series G-Shocks and still virtually disappears on my wrist. The only downside to this bracelet is that it, due to its construction, has no micro-adjustments: I have gotten away with it by removing one link from the upper side and two from the lower, but I understand how this might be a problem for some people. And speaking of downsides of the watch itself, I have found only one so far: lume. It is present on both hands and hour markers, but in miniscule quantities. I also predict the press-on caseback might be a problem for me when the time comes to replace the battery. I've been a strong proponent of screw-on casebacks for that very reason, and have some examples of rather thinner watches that successfully implement them. But we'll see. Of course, this watch ideally should have solar charging so that the battery replacement would never be required (I mean, CTL920/1616 replacement might be required every 20 to 30 years but that's a lot of time) but that's the Swiss we're talking about, they will never implement such a killer feature in addition to everything else for this price. For the same reason, we won't find an autocalendar feature here and we'll have to move the date manually if the month doesn't have 31 days. Now, let's talk about the real killer feature of this watch: the ETA PreciDrive series movement. Particularly, F05.411, which is only known to be used in the DS Caimano models, otherwise it's all but extinct by now as it has been replaced with a "superior" F05.412. Little is known about the movement itself, other than the fact that it 1) is thermocompensated and promises to keep time within 10 seconds per year deviation if the ambient temperature is within 20..30 degrees Celsius, 2) uses a Renata 371 battery which corresponds to the SR920SW standard marking, and the movement is supposed to work for about 5 years on this battery and indicate when the charge is low with the second hand skipping 4-second intervals. By the way, when setting this watch, the hands are moving tighter than usual, but the same precautions apply: first you move the minute hand a bit (~10 min) ahead and then slowly adjust it back to the exact minute position. Otherwise you'll find the minute hand lagging behind the second hand, which is extremely annoying. On the positive side, this movement has very distinct date and time setting crown positions, so you can pull the crown and advance the date without being afraid of stopping the hands and ruining the timekeeping accuracy. Neither of these things would seem out of the ordinary, save for one simple detail: I got this watch for about US $490. This is a lot for a usual quartz three-hander with a date, this is more than average for a titanium quartz three-hander with a date, but this is dirt cheap for a titanium HAQ three-hander with a date. Yes, 10 seconds per year deviation without any synchronization is considered HAQ (high accuracy quartz), and if you step into this territory, you won't find any other offerings for such a price or even twice that, if considering the same case material. It's a totally different money and a totally different level of availability to general public. And I don't even know whether or not the discontinued Longines VHP line had anything made of titanium, or any current Tissots or whatever using F05.412 have anything made of it, or if there were any titanium Citizen Chronomasters or 9F-based Grand Seikos, but as of now, I have a strong suspicion I'm wearing the least expensive titanium HAQ watch in the world. This alone IMO makes it worth mentioning in this phlog, putting into my collection and into my personal "top 10 watches of all time" list, despite it being non-Japaneseand the dial having a minor but obvious design blunder around the minutes 28 to 32 where the markers are replaced with a "SWISS MADE" writing. Other than that, this Certina is pretty boring and looks like a typical Swiss watch from the dressier side of the spectrum. But I think this is how it should be: interesting inside, boring outside. There's something about the feeling when only you, as the owner, know what your watch really can do. Like, it impresses me that it still maintains 10 bar WR with such a look and a press-on caseback. Unfortunately, this, as I already said, is an exception to the overall "quantity over quality" trend, but not without its own compromises either: looks like the world manufacturers really aren't interested in producing a perfect wristwatch, otherwise they wouldn't have anything new to sell afterwards because no one would need anything new if what they already have was perfect. Sure, one cannot exclude such a conspiracy in these crazy days, but there might be another reason. Probably good watches also became a rarely seen phenomenon because less and less people still use any wristwatches for their only intended purpose and view them solely as fashion items rather than tools they should be, and the market responds accordingly. The mere fact that such a term as "GADA watch" (GADA means "go anywhere, do anything") appeared in the English-speaking community already means that people started to admit that most watches are naturally non-GADA, i.e. created to blindly increase consumption by fitting one watches for one situations and others for others. It's hard to overestimate the level of conceptual absurdity of making an accessory out of a tool. Imagine buying various phones for various occasions nowadays. How does a wristwatch fundamentally differ? Those who view the time on their phones, by the way, shouldn't have a right to vote on such questions as they represent a pre-wristwatch era of pocket watches, only now they are much bulkier, less reliable and allow their manufacturers, governments and various third parties to track their owners. This is why I'm going to end my collection with a watch that is undoubtedly GADA, totally autonomous and will surely enter my top 3, not just top 10 like this DS Caimano. The only problem is that I'm still not sure when I'm gonna get it (hopefully within this week), but I'll definitely let you know about this. For the time being though, I really like this Certina too and hope it will live up to the manufacturer's promises about its accuracy and battery life. --- Luxferre ---